Following enactment of the Tanzanian Access to Information Act in September 2016, in early 2017, Twaweza and MIT GOV/LAB conducted a mystery shopper’s exercise on citizen’s access to public information in Tanzania. The exercise revealed that two out of three citizens’ requests for public information are usually not granted. The previous study enabled us establish the extent to which public information is accessible (or not) but did not provide a deeper understanding on the factors enabling or constraining access to public information. We focused on access to information alone contending that access to timely information would encourage more meaningful citizen participation in local development decision. However, evidence from existing literature including Twaweza’s experience reveal that information provision is necessary but not sufficient to trigger participation (behavioral changes) among targeted audiences. Moreover, the previous study focused on the demand side only (citizens’ access to public information).
The proposed revised study will focus on the supply side, with the aim of improving understanding on whether, how and why do civil servants provide (or not) public information to citizens and whether, how and why civil servants facilitate (or not) meaningful citizen participation in local development decision?
Objectives:
Perspectives on ATI: Assess civil servants’ perspectives on citizens’ access to public information
Actual practice on ATI: Assess civil servants’ experiences on citizens’ participation in local development decision processes
Perspectives on citizen participation: Assess civil servants’ perspectives on citizens’ participation in local development processes.
Actual practice on citizen participation: Assess civil servants’ experiences on citizens’ participation in local development decision processes
By perspectives we refer to the views held by civil servants towards citizens’ access to information and participation.
Do civil servants have positive or negative attitudes towards providing public information to citizens and facilitating citizens’ participation in local development decisions?
What caused these positive and negative views/attitudes? (Govt related reasons; Citizen related reasons; Personal reasons; other reasons?)
Do they realize that their views are important in enabling/constraining execution of their duties in providing information to citizens and encouraging citizen participation? How?
How can the enabling views (positive attitudes) be promoted and constraining views (negative attitudes) be changed/transformed?
Key competencies needed
We will engage the services of experienced social science researchers in undertaking this assignment. We will select consultants with experience in interviewing and accessing senior and mid-level civil servants. Preference will be given to consultants with grounded experience on citizens access to public information and citizen participation formal and alternative spaces and processes for participation in local development decisions.
Requirements
Interested individuals, firms and teams of consultants are requested to submit the following documents:
A cover letter expressing interest and availability to undertake this assignment and summarizing key competencies of the principal applicants.
Technical proposal demonstrating consultants’ understanding and response to the call for proposals
Proposed timeline
Financial proposals including consultancy fees and direct costs
CV’s of key team members including references and examples of similar past assignments
Please submit a technical and financial proposal titled “Perspectives and Experiences of Civil Servants on Access to Information and Citizen Participation in Tanzania 2019” together with relevant CVs to jobs@twaweza.org and copy to jkalemera@twaweza.org with relevant CVs not later than 5:00PM, Friday 31st May 2019.
Read here for more information.